He communicates that there has been a private consensus with the involved party, who is in agreement with the proposed changes. This situation contrasts with the operation of Bitcoin Core, highlighting the unique position of BIPs which presently has only one editor. The call for more editors to join is clear, underlining the necessity for expansion in this area.

Folkson elaborates on the nature of BIPs as primarily documentation-focused, indicating a relatively low risk associated with managing the repository. He sets forth the expectation that editors should possess the ability to work autonomously while maintaining open lines of communication. This does not imply a committee-like structure but emphasizes the need for professional conduct and collaboration among editors.

There is an acknowledgment of the potential for disagreements among the editors. However, Folkson expresses confidence in the professionalism of the candidates and their capability to resolve conflicts maturely. He also mentions a contingency plan for handling revert wars, suggesting that any participant engaging in such disruptive behavior should be removed promptly. This reflects a proactive approach to safeguarding the integrity and collaborative environment of the BIP editing process.